![]() ![]() The initial curve on the x is absolutely essential. I also think v's and w's are more legible with relatively sharp angles, as opposed to a curvy cursive approach. The initial curves for the v and w are quite helpful for legibility. The tail curve on the t is crucial to avoid confusion with a + sign. (This is probably because such loops hardly ever appear in computer or typewritten fonts.) ![]() I've tried loops on $\ell$'s, g's, j's, d's, and q's, and all of them seemed to make the letters less recognizable. In general, I've had bad experiences with vertical loops. At present, I am often omitting the top and bottom curves when the l is part of a word. I tried using a cursive $\ell$ for a while, but it never looked good inside of words, and it still wasn't very legible as a variable. The l (ell) is my newest letter, and I'm not really sure about it yet. I will also draw a 1 as a simple vertical line if I think it's clear from context. Similar statements hold for the top curve on the i. I often omit the bottom "tail" on the f when writing it in the middle of a word, but I always include it when it's part of an equation. If you draw your circles and stems separately, they will constantly get disconnected, which vastly decreases legibility. It's crucial to have versions of a, b, d, p, and q that can be written using a single stroke. Just make sure to use print letters instead of cursive. Here is my current font:Ĭapital letters aren't listed, but my experience is that they're all fairly straightforward. I changed my handwriting font years ago for precisely this purpose, and I have continued to tweak my letterforms over the years, using the algorithm of changing the form of whichever letters seem to generate the most confusion. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |